” SRUPO DE EMPRESAS
Santiago 02 de diciembre de 2013
Señor
Fernando Coloma Correa
Superintendente
Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros
Avda. Libertador B. O’Higgins N*1449, Piso 8
Presente
REF.: Comunica Hecho Esencial
Empresa Nacional del Petróleo
Inscripción Registro Valores N* 783
De nuestra consideración:
En virtud de lo dispuesto en el Artículo 9? y en el Artículo 10* inciso 2” de la Ley N” 18.045 de
mercado de valores, y en la Norma de Carácter General N*30, de esa Superintendencia, y
debidamente facultado, informo a usted que con fecha 02 de diciembre en curso, la
clasificadora de riesgo internacional Moody’s ha revisado la clasificación corporativa de la
Empresa Nacional del Petróleo (ENAP) pasando de Baa3 con perspectivas Negativas a una
clasificación de Baa3 con perspectivas Estables .
Los factores que motivan esta modificación de clasificación en rating se encuentran explícitos
en nota integra adjunta de Moody’s.
Sin otro particular, saluda atentamente a usted,
ly a | A y
Julio Bertrand Planella
erente General .
EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL PETRÓLEO
AP
DS enap refinerías enap sipetrol
EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL PETRÓLEO ENAP en Magallanes ENAP REFINERÍAS S.A. ENAP SIPETROL S.A.
Av.Vitacura 2736, Piso 10 xx Santiago – Chile José Nogueira 1101 xx Punta Arenas – Chile Ay. Borgoño 25777 + Concón – Chile Av.Vitacura 2736, Piso 10 xx Santiago – Chile
Teléfono (56N2) 2803000 = Fax (S6)(2) 2803199 Teléfono (56)(61) 298371 + Fax (S61(61) 247456 Teléfono (56)(32) 2650200 xx Fax (56)(32) Teléfono (56)(2) 2803000 xx Fax (56)(2) 2803199
vemvenpel
wrwwempiel 2811243 vewwwensp.ct vovoempiel
MoobDY’s
INVESTORS SERVICE
Rating Action: Moody’s rates ENAP’s notes Baa3; outlook stable
Global Credit Research – 02 Dec 2013
New York, December 02, 2013 — Moody’s Investors Service affirmed Empresa Nacional del Petróleo’s (ENAP)
Baa3 foreign currency rating and changed the rating outlook to stable from negative. At the same time, Moody’s
assigned a Baa3 rating to ENAP’s CHF 215 million five-year senior unsecured notes due 2018. Proceeds from
ENAP’s Swiss franc issuance will be used to repay debt maturities.
“The affirmation of the Baa3 rating with a stable outlook reflects ENAP’s success in improving its earnings profile
and reducing financial leverage,” commented Gretchen French, Moody’s Vice President. “While ENAP continues
to have elevated financial leverage for an investment-grade rating, its Baa3 rating factors in a high level of implicit
support from the Chilean government.”
Issuer: Empresa Nacional del Petróleo
Assignments:
…. Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2018, Assigned Baa3
Outlook Actions:
… Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative
Affirmations:
….Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2019, Affirmed Baa3
.. Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2021, Affirmed Baa3
….Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2014, Affirmed Baa3
.. Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture due 2020, Affirmed Baa3
RATINGS RATIONALE
ENAP has improved its financial leverage profile in 2013 through higher earnings generation and modest debt
reduction from asset sales, and we expect the company to achieve continued profitability in 2014. However, the
company’s debt burden and financial leverage profile remain high for its Baa3 rating, particularly in the context of
its exposure to the import-dependent Chilean refining sector.
ENAP’s fundamental earnings performance in 2013 has significantly improved from 2012 levels, with EBITDA in
the first nine months of 2013 reaching over $550 million, as compared to around $5 million in 2012.
The EBITDA improvement in 2013 has been driven by lower LNG import costs, commercial sales of LNG in Chile
at favorable prices, cost reimbursements from the government for below market natural gas sales, and the full
earnings impact from the company’s new alkylation unit at its Aconcagua refinery.
At September 30, 2013, ENAP had about $4.3 billion of total adjusted debt. Pro-forma for the expected after-tax
proceeds from the sale of ENAP’s stake in Primax Peru and Primax Ecuador, ENAP’s debt/EBITDA for the last
twelve months ending September 30, 2013 was about 7x. This represents a considerable improvement from
debt/EBITDA of 104x in 2012.
Our stable rating outlook assumes that ENAP continues to focus on reducing debt balances over the medium term
and that Chilean implicit government support of ENAP remains high.
IFENAP is unable to continue its modestly deleveraging trend or if there are indications of reduced implicit
government support for ENAP, its baseline credit assessment could be lowered, resulting in a downgrade of its
Baa3 foreign currency rating.
While a rating upgrade is unlikely over the near-term, a significantly improved sustainable financial leverage profile
more supportive of the cyclicality and volatility of the refining sector could have positive rating implications over the
medium term (debt/EBITDA approaching 5x).
Since ENAP is 100% owned by the Chilean government (Aa3 stable), ENAP’s foreign currency rating reflects the
application of Moody’s joint default rating methodology for government-related issuers (GRIs). ENAP’s rating
combines: (i) ENAP’s underlying baseline credit assessment of b2, and (ii) the willingness and ability of the
government of Chile to provide credit support to ENAP in a distress situation. The Chilean government’s ability to
provide support to ENAP is measured by its Aa3 local currency rating and stable outlook, weakened somewhat by
the medium dependence of the government and the company on credit factors that could cause stress on both
simultaneously. Moody’s considers the government’s willingness to support the company as high, considering the
strategic importance of ENAP to the Chilean economy, ENAP’s 100% ownership by the state, and the
government’s involvement in the company’s budget approval and other policy-related processes.
The principal methodology used in this rating was the Global Refining and Marketing Rating Methodology
published in December 2009. Other methodologies used include the Government-Related Issuers methodology
published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these
methodologies.
Empresa Nacional del Petróleo is Chile’s national oil company. It is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory
disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class
of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance
with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain
regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating
action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in
relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where
the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner
that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for
the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating
action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will
be those of the guarantor entity, Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to
jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating
outlook or rating review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal
entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for
each credit rating.
Gretchen French
VP – Senior Credit Officer
Corporate Finance Group
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A,
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Steven Wood
MD – Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
MooDY’s
INVESTORS SERVICE
0 2013 Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights
reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (“MIS”) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE
MOODY”S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT
COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S
CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS,
OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN
ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY
ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY
OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE
VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE
NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S
PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY”S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE
RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT
RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR
ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S
PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE
ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR
PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE
REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED,
REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN
WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON
WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S
from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as
well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind.
MOODY”‘S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient
quality and from sources Moody’s considers to be reliable, including, when appropriate, independent third-party
sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY’S have any liability to any
person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error
(negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY’S or any of
its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis,
interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special,
consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if
MOODY”‘S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use,
any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any,
constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion
and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the
information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing,
holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS,
COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH
RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR
MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most
issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and
preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating
services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies
and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain
affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from
MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually
at www.moodys.com under the heading “Shareholder Relations – Corporate Governance – Director and
Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services
License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or
Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended
to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By
continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are
accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you
represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of
section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a
debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to
retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit
rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Link al archivo en CMFChile: https://www.cmfchile.cl/sitio/aplic/serdoc/ver_sgd.php?s567=8ce9a099958c72e981482d4b0dfe6d7bVFdwQmVFMTZSWGxOUkVWNFRYcFZNMDEzUFQwPQ==&secuencia=-1&t=1682366909