Hechos Esenciales Emisores Chilenos Un proyecto no oficial. Para información oficial dirigirse a la CMF https://cmfchile.cl

EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL PETROLEO 2012-06-15 T-18:09

E

SNAP

GRUPO DE EMPRESAS

Santiago, 15 junio de 2012

Señor

Fernando Coloma Correa

Superintendente

Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros
Avda. Libertador B. O’Higgins N* 1449, Piso 8
Presente

REF.: Comunica Hecho Esencial
Empresa Nacional del Petróleo

Inscripción Registro Valores N* 783

De nuestra consideración:

En virtud de lo dispuesto en el Artículo 9? y en el Artículo 10” inciso 2* de la Ley N* 18.045 de
mercado de valores, y en la Norma de Carácter General N” 30, de esa Superintendencia, y
debidamente facultado, informo a Usted que con fecha 15 de junio en curso, la clasificadora de
riesgos internacional Moody’s ha rebajado la clasificación de riesgo de deuda en moneda
extranjera de la Empresa Nacional del Petróleo (ENAP) de “Baa1” a “Baa2 – ” negative Outlook.

Los factores que motivan esta baja de rating se encuentran explícitos en nota integra adjunta
de Moody’s.

Sin otro particular, saluda atentamente a Ud.,

CHAGAVÍA
Gerente General y
EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL PETROLEO

RI

MA/AA
IVA Ó.., refinerías Sep sipetrol
EMPRESA NACIONAL DEL PETRÓLEO ENAP en Magallanes ENAP REFINERÍAS S.A, ENAP SIPETROL S.A.
Ay.Vitacura 2736, Piso 10 xx Santiago – Chile José Nogueira 1101 + Punta Arenas – Chile Av. Borgoño 25777 + Concón – Chile Av.Vitacura 2736, Piso 10 xx Santiago – Chile
Teléfono (56)(2) 2803000 + Fax (56)(2) 2803199 Teléfono (56)(61) 298371 xx Fax (56)(61) 247456 Teléfono (56)(32) 2650200 + Fax (56)(32) Teléfono (56)(2) 2803000 + Fax (56)(2) 2803199

www.enap.cl wonw.enap.cl 2811243 wwwenap.l www.emp.cl

MooDY’s
INVESTORS SERVICE

Rating Action: Moody’s downgrades Empresa Nacional del Petroleo’s (ENAP) ratings
to Baa2; outlook negative

Global Credit Research – 15 Jun 2012

New York, June 15, 2012 — Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the foreign currency ratings of Empresa
Nacional del Petróleo’s (ENAP) to Baa2 from Baa1. The rating outlook is negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating downgrade reflects ENAP’s elevated financial leverage and highly volatile earnings. ENAP’s recent
financial performance has been below expectations, with the generation of negative EBITDA over the last two
Quarters and rising debt levels. While we expect ENAP to post positive EBITDA for the full year 2012, financial
leverage is expected to remain high relative to peers and given its exposure to the import-dependent Chilean
refining sector.

The negative outlook reflects that, even with the assumption of improved profitability over the near-term, ENAP’s
financial leverage could remain high for the underlying baseline credit assessment and Baa2 rating. In addition, the
company has very high refinancing needs. Without a significant capital infusion from the Chilean government, we
believe the company will be challenged in materially reducing debt levels to a level more consistent with its
underlying credit assessment.

ENAP’s performance deteriorated over the last two quarters mainly as a result of rapidly rising crude oil prices,
narrowing spreads between lighter and heavier crude oils, and rising energy costs. Moody’s expects the recent
decline in crude oil prices and more supportive crude discounts should help support a return to positive EBITDA
generation for the company over the near-term. We also note that ENAP has undertaken several initiatives in order
to improve its cost structure, including undertaking certain management changes, and continues to focus on
improving profitability levels. In addition, we expect ENAP will have lower LNG import costs in 2013, which will
materially lower its energy costs.

IF ENAP is unable to meaningfully strengthen its financial profile over the near term, its baseline credit assessment
could be lowered, resulting in a downgrade of its Baa2 foreign currency rating. The Baa2 rating could also be
pressured without demonstrated clear financial support by the government of Chile.

While a rating upgrade is unlikely over the near-term, a significantly improved sustainable financial leverage profile
more supportive of the cyclicality and volatility of the refining sector could have positive rating implications over the
medium term (permanent debt reduction of at least $1 billion).

The ratings downgrade is the result of the lowering of ENAP’s underlying baseline credit assessment. Moody’s
lowered ENAP’s underlying baseline credit assessment to 14 (mapping to a B1 rating) from 12 (mapping to a Ba2
rating). Since ENAP is 100% owned by the Chilean state, ENAP’s foreign currency rating reflects the application of
Moody’s joint default rating methodology for government-related issuers (GRIs). ENAP’s rating combines: (i)
ENAP’s underlying baseline credit assessment, and (ii) the willingness and ability of the government of Chile to
provide credit support to ENAP in a distress situation. The Chilean government’s ability to provide support to ENAP
is measured by its Aa3 local currency rating and stable outlook, weakened somewhat by the medium dependence
of the government and the company on credit factors that could cause stress on both simultaneously. Moody’s
considers the government’s willingness to support the company as high, considering the strategic importance of
ENAP to the Chilean economy, ENAP’s 100% ownership by the state, and the government’s involvement in the
company’s budget approval and other policy-related processes.

The principal methodology used in rating Empresa Nacional del Petróleo was the Global Refining and Marketing
Industry Methodology published in December 2009. Other methodologies used include the Government-Related
Issuers methodology published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of
these methodologies.

Empresa Nacional del Petróleo is Chile’s national oil company. lt is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU
are endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in
accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further
information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is
available on www.moodys.com.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory
disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of
debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with
Moody s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory
disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for
securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this
announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation
to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the
transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that
would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the
respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following : parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved
in the ratings, public information, confidential and proprietary Moody’s Investors Service information, and
confidential and proprietary Moody’s Analytics information.

Moody’s considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the
purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody’s adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality
and from sources Moody’s considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources.
However, Moody’s is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information
received in the rating process.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of
interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO’s major shareholders
(above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO
and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to
the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. Amember of the board of directors of this rated entity
may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody’s Corporation; however, Moody’s has
not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further
information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating
history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody’s ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody’s provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website
www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity
that has issued the rating.

Gretchen French

Vice President – Senior Analyst
Corporate Finance Group
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

USA
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Steven Wood

MD – Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

USA

JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376

SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

MoobDY’s
INVESTORS SERVICE

O 2012 Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY”S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (“MIS”) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE
MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT
COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT
OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR
DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET
[TS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS
IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND
MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR
HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE
INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND
DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES.
NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN
INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'”S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES
MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WTH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL
MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR
PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT
LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED,
FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR
SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY
MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information
contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the
possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided
“AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in
assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody’s considers to be reliable, including, when
appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance
independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY’S have
any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to,
any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY’S or any

of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis,
interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special,
consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if
MOODY’ is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such
information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the
information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or
recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its
own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY
PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GVEN OR MADE BY
MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers
of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred
stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services
rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and
procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations
that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have
also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at
www.moodys.com under the heading “Shareholder Relations – Corporate Governance – Director and Shareholder
Affiliation Policy.”

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61
003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided
only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this
document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a
representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly
disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act
2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody’s Japan K.K. ((MJIKK”) are
MJKK’s current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In
such a case, “MIS” in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with “MJKK”. MJKK is a wholly-owned
credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of
the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. lt would be dangerous for retail investors to make
any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional
adviser.

Link al archivo en CMFChile: https://www.cmfchile.cl/sitio/aplic/serdoc/ver_sgd.php?s567=bf70212f452eb7ebd394e7340b242b5fVFdwQmVFMXFRVEpOUkVFMFRVUkJNVTFuUFQwPQ==&secuencia=-1&t=1682366909

Por Hechos Esenciales
Hechos Esenciales Emisores Chilenos Un proyecto no oficial. Para información oficial dirigirse a la CMF https://cmfchile.cl

Categorias

Archivo

Categorías

Etiquetas

27 (2563) 1616 (1196) 1713 (992) Actualizaciones (16147) Cambio de directiva (8833) Colocación de valores (1805) Compraventa acciones (1341) Dividendos (11362) Dividend payments (1275) Dividends (1283) Emisión de valores (1805) fondo (6468) fund (1545) General news (1469) Hechos relevantes (16145) importante (5118) IPSA (4331) Junta Extraordinaria (5604) Junta Ordinaria (10691) Noticias generales (16146) Nueva administración (8833) Others (1462) Otros (16141) Pago de dividendos (11129) Profit sharing (1275) Regular Meeting (1610) Relevant facts (1467) Reparto de utilidades (11129) Transacción activos (1341) Updates (1470)